| 740RA-A3333-ACUL1 75LBA-PDEFA |
 |
價格：88 元(人民幣) | 產(chǎn)地：本地 |
| 最少起訂量：1件 | 發(fā)貨地：泉州 | |
| 上架時間：2017-08-02 14:45:40 | 瀏覽量：137 | |
深圳長欣自動化設(shè)備有限公司（泉州辦）
 |
||
| 經(jīng)營模式：貿(mào)易公司 | 公司類型：私營合伙企業(yè) | |
| 所屬行業(yè)：PLC控制系統(tǒng) | 主要客戶：全國 | |
 在線咨詢  |
||
| 聯(lián)系人:吳工 (先生) | 手機(jī):15359571759 |
電話: |
傳真: |
| 郵箱:2937878768@qq.com | 地址:福建泉州市鯉城區(qū)南益鯉景灣三期B棟915室 |
|
（DCS系統(tǒng)）和（機(jī)器人系統(tǒng)）及（大型伺服控制系統(tǒng)）備件大賣！叫賣！特賣！賣賣賣！ Economic development has always relied on both the market and the government, and both should play their necessary roles. I think we should establish efficient markets and competent government at the same time. Thus, an organic system can be created. In 1970s and 1980s, the outside world generally believed that the slow development of economies in developing countries was probably caused by "inferior" market economy systems, in which distortions were created by too much government interference in the market. Thus, after the 1980s, all the development assistance, whether from developed countries or multilateral institutions, was conditional. That is, the recipients were told that they must have market reform before getting the aid. Although the developed countries were well-intentioned, the countries that implemented such reforms generally ended up with various economic problems. Some recipient countries faced stagnation, crisis and even economic collapse. In fact, in the last two decades of the 20th century, the average economic growth speed in developing countries was slower than in the 1960s and 1970s, and crises occurred more regularly. Therefore, the so-called advanced model of the developed countries actually failed. There are two reasons for this. First, there are some industries with very low efficiency that would collapse without government subsidies. Although these industries may be inefficient, a large number of people are employed in them, and if subsidies are canceled it leads to severe unemployment and political instability. Second, there are also many phenomena that may look like distortions to developed countries but that are not necessarily abnormal. This is related to countries' different development stages. In short, the system used by developed countries is not necessarily suitable in developing countries, but the international community did not consider this several decades ago. In fact, we should clearly recognize that economic development is a process, in which economic competitiveness must be ensured at each stage of development and on top of that there needs to be capital accumulation, industry upgrading and technological innovation. Second, the government should take measures when the market encounters failures. After the financial crisis in 2008, there was much reflection on the development plan implemented in the 1980s. The market and government are two important aspects of economic development. The market fundamentalism that says markets can solve everything is no longer an adequate or persuasive solution. The market may sometimes lose its ability for self adjustment, especially during the process of economic transition and industrial upgrading. The market is not capable of managing resource allocation all by itself. In order to endow entrepreneurs with the best incentives, help from the government is undoubtedly needed. Of course, we are also afraid of excessive government intervention resulting in distortion, so a competent government should always keep market effectiveness in mind. If this is not perfectly balanced, two trends will emerge. The first is government inaction. If all governmental intervention is treated as misbehavior, the government will be inactive. The other possibility is overreaction. If lacking in professional understanding of the current context, the government may take excessive or improper action in the market. I am convinced that proper consultation is vital for the government. Industrial policy is also the same. The implementation of industrial policies in most of the countries has proven to be a failure, but we have not seen any country that has successfully caught up with other countries without implementing an industrial policy. Against this background, as scholars, our responsibility is to study the reasons and principles that led to both the failure and success of the industrial policy so that we can contribute to the further design of industrial policy. Currently, there is an opinion that it is wrong for the government to take measures in the market, and that industrial policies should also be avoided. But if all government intervention is counter-productive, we would not have seen such achievements in industrial development and economic transformation over the years. When we see the potential for future improvement, we should also recognize previous successes. |
| 版權(quán)聲明：以上所展示的信息由會員自行提供，內(nèi)容的真實性、準(zhǔn)確性和合法性由發(fā)布會員負(fù)責(zé)。機(jī)電之家對此不承擔(dān)任何責(zé)任。 友情提醒：為規(guī)避購買風(fēng)險，建議您在購買相關(guān)產(chǎn)品前務(wù)必確認(rèn)供應(yīng)商資質(zhì)及產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量。 |
機(jī)電之家網(wǎng) - 機(jī)電行業(yè)權(quán)威網(wǎng)絡(luò)宣傳媒體
關(guān)于我們 | 聯(lián)系我們 | 廣告合作 | 付款方式 | 使用幫助 | 會員助手 | 免費鏈接Copyright 2025 jdzj.com All Rights Reserved??技術(shù)支持：機(jī)電之家 服務(wù)熱線：0571-87774297
網(wǎng)站經(jīng)營許可證:浙B2-20080178
