PRD-AMPE25EA-00 PRD-AMPE25Ez-01 |
聯(lián)系人:吳工 (先生) | 手機(jī):15359571759 |
電話: |
傳真: |
郵箱:2937878768@qq.com | 地址:福建泉州市鯉城區(qū)南益鯉景灣三期B棟915室 |
(DCS系統(tǒng))和(機(jī)器人系統(tǒng))及(大型伺服控制系統(tǒng))備件大賣!叫賣!特賣!賣賣賣! The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a congressional commission of the US government, claimed Wednesday in its report that Beijing has used economic coercion to retaliate against South Korea for its 2016 decision to deploy the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) anti-missile system on its soil. As proof of China's economic coercion, the report used decreases in March sales of South Korean automobiles and foodstuffs in China and downsized bilateral exchanges. The commission's selective use of data seems to have perfectly shown how terribly South Korea has been victimized by China's economic retaliation. However, the truth paints a different picture. According to South Korea's official statistics, from January to March this year, South Korea's exports to China increased by 17.6 percent on a year-on-year basis, and its imports from China grew by 15.6 percent. South Korea enjoys an upward trade surplus with China that went up by 22.6 percent year-on-year. China remains South Korea's biggest export destination and import source. In comparison, South Korea's exports to the US in the same period decreased by 2 percent. The report said that "Chinese sales of South Korean carmakers Hyundai and Kia dropped 52 percent year-on-year in March as consumer boycotts hit the brands." The commission may have found the reason, but it is unfortunately the wrong one. The fall in sales of South Korean cars resulted from a variety of reasons. These brands are not as attractive as their competitors from Japan and Germany, and their products are not localized enough to cater to Chinese consumers. This is rather a long accumulated outcome than a political one. Indeed, cultural exchanges in tourism and entertainment have decreased. The Chinese foreign ministry has explained more than once that China takes a proactive and open attitude toward bilateral exchanges and cooperation, but it also needs corresponding public support. It says that South Korea had better listen to public opinion. When Seoul's insistence on the THAAD deployment to dovetail the US strategy jeopardized China's national security, it's totally natural that the agitated Chinese public would make their own choice. In fact, it is the US that is a veteran manipulator of economic sticks to strike countries not to its liking. Washington's stepped-up sanctions on Russia have worried its EU allies recently. And only on Wednesday, the US imposed fresh sanctions on 13 senior Venezuelan officials. If the US does want to protect South Korea, it should stop driving a wedge between its Asian ally and China, not the other way around. |
版權(quán)聲明:以上所展示的信息由會(huì)員自行提供,內(nèi)容的真實(shí)性、準(zhǔn)確性和合法性由發(fā)布會(huì)員負(fù)責(zé)。機(jī)電之家對(duì)此不承擔(dān)任何責(zé)任。 友情提醒:為規(guī)避購(gòu)買風(fēng)險(xiǎn),建議您在購(gòu)買相關(guān)產(chǎn)品前務(wù)必確認(rèn)供應(yīng)商資質(zhì)及產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量。 |
機(jī)電之家網(wǎng) - 機(jī)電行業(yè)權(quán)威網(wǎng)絡(luò)宣傳媒體
關(guān)于我們 | 聯(lián)系我們 | 廣告合作 | 付款方式 | 使用幫助 | 會(huì)員助手 | 免費(fèi)鏈接Copyright 2025 jdzj.com All Rights Reserved??技術(shù)支持:機(jī)電之家 服務(wù)熱線:0571-87774297
網(wǎng)站經(jīng)營(yíng)許可證:浙B2-20080178